Jul 23rd 2015

Pass The Hatchet, Please

by Alan Skinner

After a career that has spanned threecontinents and has included television, theatre, freelance writing, corporate consultancy and even a decade as a senior executive in one of the world’sleading banks, Alan Skinner has now dedicated his efforts to writing full-time. Todate, he has three novels, a children’s picture-storybook and a play, Daisy Chain (which premiered in Melbourne in 2010) to his credit. As if he didn’t have enough to do, he was also co-inventor, designer and producer of Cinematique,a film-based board game launched in 2006.

Bernard Shaw once observed that a biography tells more about the biographer than the subject. While there is some truth to this, the poor Fabian playwright-essayist-critic-troublemaker was obviously still recovering from the shock of reading Frank Harris's autobiography written under the guise of a biography of one Mr George Bernard Shaw. Nonetheless, what truth there is in the statement could also well apply to reviewers. Unfortunately, we are rarely interested in the life and opinions of the reviewer, unless they have reached some level of celebrity status, or, better still, notoriety. And as there are few Addison de Witts (or Kenneth Tynans if you prefer to be rooted in reality) prowling around the bookshelves or in the foyers of our theatres, we find the presence of the reviewer something of an intrusion.

It's probably an easy claim to make because it's never happened to me but recently I found myself envying Michael Cunningham. If the name doesn't ring a bell, he's the author whose book, By Nightfall, was the grindstone on which Adam Mars-Jones sharpened his tools of the trade enough to win the Hatchet Job of the Year award. At least, I reflected, Mr Cunningham had his book reviewed by someone who was good at his job, someone who cared, someone who gave Mr Cunningham food for thought, at least; someone who wasn't lazy. And someone whose personal presence in the review is usually not unwelcome.

Now, I know that the accepted wisdom for an author is not to engage in a dispute with reviewers; the prospect of coming out of the exchange unscathed and with one's dignity intact are rather slight. But what happens when one has a bone to pick with a reviewer who has given one's book a favourable review? Does the same wisdom still hold?

Which is what happened to me fairly recently. My book, Brimstone did receive a favourable review that roused in me a good deal of anger and a considerable sense of injustice. In all likelihood, though, I would have let my indignation simmer until it vaporised had I not read a subsequent article in The Guardianin which Mr Mars-Jones declared,

 ‘The only "bad" review in my book is one whose writing is soggy, its formulas of praise or blame off the same stale shelf.’

Soggy. The word struck a chord with me and revived my ire at the review I had received. When I first read the review that had made me angry, the word that leapt to mind was ‘lazy’ but soggy suits the review perfectly: inert, uninteresting and, like a sponge, without much substance except what it could suck up from what lay around it.

As I pointed out, the review did not contain any unfavourable remarks about the book. In fact, it concluded by proclaiming,

‘A worthy read, perfect for the young adult, fantasy loving set; true devotees will anxiously await the next installment in this original series.’

True, it’s pretty vapid but nothing a publisher or an author would take amiss. Nonetheless, I did take it rather amiss.

Like all small publishers (in my case even very small is an aggrandisement) - and self-published authors – I faced the problem of getting attention for my books and getting them professionally reviewed. As one part of my attempt to overcome this, I hit upon the idea of paying to have the book professionally reviewed by Kirkus. They are not, I thought, just anyone. Indeed, they seems to be held in relatively high regard – at least by themselves, judging by their claim to be home to ‘The World’s Toughest Book Critics’. So, I paid my money and duly waited for the review, which did arrive, I have to say, within the promised four weeks.

I read the review and instantly, I became a dissatisfied customer. I had expected 300 words of critical evaluation and commercial assessment. I received a 227 word synopsis and 107 words of anodyne comment. Nothing of value to either author or reader. Certainly for would-be readers, nothing that, in Mars-Jones’s words, indicated whether ‘They're being guided to pleasure or warned against disappointment.’

At this point I faced a dilemma. I felt like a consumer who had been given a shoddy product. As an aggrieved consumer, I considered calling Ralph Nader  to ask him whether he would consider embarking on a crusade against reviewers who provide a defective product. On the other hand, consumerism is the handmaiden of capitalism and to be affronted as a consumer is nothing more than complaining that our thirty pieces of silver do not buy as much as we thought.

Fortunately, though, I was also affronted by something more noble: the failure of one link if the literary value chain. I could, therefore, legitimately complain without compromising any political or social principles. It's always nice to have a moral haven from which to sally forth.

Reviews are part of the organism of creative endeavour. (For the purposes of the rest of this article, I shall limit my references to just literature, rather than resort to finding various terms to describe creative pursuits in general, all of which will be unsatisfactory, being either too all-embracing for some and too miserly in its embrace for others). They have purpose - and, if we are lucky, value - for both author and reader. They are the reader's assayer and the author's sounding board. And the reviewer who acts as neither is letting the side down. Which is precisely the point that prompted this article for the review I received seemed to be neither use nor ornament to anyone.

But then, I found myself questioning whether any of this mattered. Do we need reviewers, at least those of the old-fashioned professional, expert type? Publishing is in a state of transformation. Perhaps writing itself is. The number of titles published each year is staggering and a great number of them are by authors who self-publish. And all of them have the same basic need: to be noticed. And readers, the consumers of this huge grab-bag of literature, naturally want to open the poke and see the pig before they buy.

Mainstream reviewers shun self-published books. They shun most traditionally published books, for that matter, overwhelmed by the volume that lands on their desk and deafened by the voices clamouring for attention. And for the most part, mainstream reviewers come across as the literary equivalent of Choice magazine, rather than wielders of Mars-Jones’s restorative scalpel. I understand why they do so and the pressures that operate on them. It would take a bold and brave literary editor of a mainstream newspaper or magazine to eschew the familiar and seek out the new and unknown. There is no reason to believe that bravery is any more common among Arts editors than among the general public.

Publishers also bombard bloggers and those with the largest following are becoming as difficult to access as reviewers. There are marketing experts waiting to pounce on the self-published authors the moment they appear on Twitter or Facebook, offering expertise noticeably bereft of wisdom, and all offering the same advice and strategy, albeit with the order changed. Amazon reviews have become so devalued that they are more like a show of hands for approval than reviews for guidance.

As the publishing model evolves, perhaps reviewers will become outsourced, fee-for-service providers, along with editors, cover designers and format converters. Will we see CreateView alongside CreateSpace, offering ‘independent’ third-party reviews?  I can only shudder at the consequence if that happens.

Will the web space return us to the days - days a very long time past - when reviews grew from public discussion and response? Are the bloggers and those who comment on their blogs the true reviewers of the future? Have they made traditional reviewing irrelevant, as some claim? It is interesting to note that among the incessant, shrill cries that traditional publishing is dead and that traditional publishers (pejoratively termed legacy publishers, as if they are forlorn burdens from an unenlightened past) are dinosaurs who must adopt a new business model in order to evolve into useful beings, there are few asking whether the reviewing model is equally out-dated.

The glib response is the answer to the questions in the previous paragraphs. That is, that "Yes, book bloggers have made legacy reviewers redundant". It's a glib and superficial response, though, because looking at change and calling it the future is hardly an assessment. We need to understand what that change means and how we should manage it. Mcluhan was right when he claimed that first we shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us but the really important part of that is that it is a reiterative process. In order for us to shape the tools to come, we have to manage and understand the tools previously wrought. And what happens when that subsequent shaping is a reversion to a previous state? If print technology gave us linear thinking, has the web, with its complex inter-connectivity, delineated our way of thinking? Is cyber-life a reversion to a cacophonous forum of opinion?

It can seem so. For every one quality book blogger there are hundreds of negligible value, readers with opinions; which is not what defines a reviewer.

It seems to me that we are in greater need of reviewers than ever before. But good ones, who are not just passionate, though often indiscriminate, devourers of a genre or a style; who are not bland and formulaic, afraid to dip more than their toe in the water lest the pool prove too deep. Reviewers need to be informed and opinionated but held accountable for their quality not their opinions. Like writers, reviewers are readers, too. Unlike writers, though, reviewers  have to play to the market. The market creates their purpose. That doesn’t mean they have to pander to it; just be true to their purpose.

I have no idea whether what Kirkus provided to me is of the same standard they provide to others who are compelled to pay either because they are self-published or because they need post-publication attention. I did send an email expressing my disapproval, perhaps in stronger terms than I should have, but no one deigned to reply.  I do know that I would have preferred a hatchet job to lazy praise. We need reviewers but we need them to rise above mediocrity. If Kirkus wants to be in this space, they really need to do better.

For Alan Skinner's twitter account, please click here.



This article is brought to you by the author who owns the copyright to the text.

Should you want to support the author’s creative work you can use the PayPal “Donate” button below.

Your donation is a transaction between you and the author. The proceeds go directly to the author’s PayPal account in full less PayPal’s commission.

Facts & Arts neither receives information about you, nor of your donation, nor does Facts & Arts receive a commission.

Facts & Arts does not pay the author, nor takes paid by the author, for the posting of the author's material on Facts & Arts. Facts & Arts finances its operations by selling advertising space.



Browse articles by author

More Literary Essays

Jun 10th 2021
Fiction - but based in history.
May 23rd 2021
Fiction - Introduction by the Author: "The mind of a fly, such as it is, is a primitive thing – archaic and amoral, devoid of pity, remorse, forgiveness… and love. And yet. And yet we know within every species there is a great deal of variation: every species is, after all, an ingenious structure formed by Nature. Goethe – who we sometimes forget was as great a scientist as he was a poet – yes, the divine Goethe grasped two simple but essential truths. First, that species are real in themselves; not some mere classificatory device created by us. (I might add – inasmuch as it relates to the story that I am shortly to tell – that confidence in the reality of species as such was for the better part of the last century based entirely on the incontrovertible fact of reproductive isolation). Every species may indeed be viewed as a manifestation of planfulness. Yet we also know, and this is the second principle, by no means are species totally homogenous. There is always intraspecific variety, as they say – a flexibility in behavior and phenomena. The crucial point is that this diversity if you will – functional or otherwise – is the very raison d’être of the species. Is it any wonder then that Nature loves her eccentrics: every species has its individuals that wander along new roads – the honeybee, say, who returns carrying news within in his unique dance of hitherto unknown gardens and flowers, or a new tree in which to rear the hive. Insect behavior can be quite plastic."
Mar 18th 2020
EXTRACT: "In my essay Elie Wiesel’s Early Work I promised a return to the novels by Albert Camus (1913-1960), 1957 Nobel Laureate in Literature. Then the world as we know it changed with the onset of COVID-19 and the relevance of Camus’ novel The Plague, published in 1947, struck hard."
Jan 18th 2020
EXTRACT: "The harmful impact of air pollution caused by diesel exhaust fumes on our health is well known. It’s responsible for causing everything from respiratory problems to dementia and even certain types of cancers. But what most people don’t realise is that exhaust fumes aren’t the only cause of air pollution. In fact, up to 55% of roadside traffic pollution is made of non-exhaust particles, with around 20% of that pollution coming from brake dust. And as our latest research reveals, these particles may be just as damaging to our lungs as exhaust fumes."
Oct 26th 2019
EXTRACT: "We didn’t have emails or social media back then, so I’d usually call once a year and check in. Though I was careful not to ask, my ex-wife would graciously give me updates on “The Baby.” She told him about me early on and he just shrugged and said, “Okay.” The title of ‘father’ belongs to the man who raised him. She did once tell me there are times when she’s washing dishes or preoccupied, and he’ll come up behind her saying something, and she’ll turn around expecting to see me. "
Sep 10th 2019
Extract: "Khodasevich’s prose is as crystalline as his poetry, and this rendition by veteran translator and academic Sarah Vitali reads with such punch and verve that some of the personality sketches might have been written today for a mainstream magazine. Her endnotes add background and fascinating detail that put the forgotten era in context. "
Jul 17th 2019
Blurring the line between fiction and real life is one of the intrigues of good writing. Much of Saul Bellow’s wild antics in “Humboldt’s Gift” actually happened to him, but how much? Did Philip Roth’s “Portnoy’s Complaint” originate in his personal life?  Intriguing, perhaps, but none of this really matters if the story is credible and the writing holds up. Any reader with an analytical bent will wonder, however, where the truth is located in a good story. I certainly did, reading Mary L. Tabor’s new collection of twelve short stories, "The Woman Who Never Cooked."
May 31st 2018
Postcolonial scholarship has overwhelmingly focused on the legacy of Western empires – but despite a long history of foreign expansionism and domination, Russia, in its various incarnations, has never received the same amount of critical scrutiny. The Tsarist empire’s position outside the West proper, the Soviet Union’s stated opposition to imperialism, and the fact that Russia’s empire was a contiguous land empire rather than an overseas one all helped shield it from postcolonial critique. The result is a strange oversight – especially considering the fact that the heir to the largest continental empire in modern history clearly remains uncomfortable with the independence of many of its former subordinates.
May 24th 2018

At the age of 50, Henry James created a detailed portrait of an experimental novelist in old age, in his story “The Middle Years.” Terminally ill, the novelist Dencombe receives in the mail the published version of what he realizes will be his final work, a novel titled The Middle Years.

Apr 25th 2018
Ever since I first began listening to popular music on a transistor radio, I have been fascinated by one-hit wonders. Today, oldies stations can devote entire weekends to singers and groups who had one hit and were never heard from again, including such classics as the Penguins’ “Earth Angel,” the Teddy Bears’ “To Know Him Is to Love Him,” and the Murmaids’ “Popsicles and Icicles.” When I began studying creativity, I discovered that one-hit wonders were not unique to pop. Grant Wood’s American Gothic and Maya Lin’s Vietnam Veterans Memorial are celebrated instances in which the name of an artist instantly calls to mind a single work, and vice versa....
Apr 3rd 2018

Serious readers like to see a review or two about big, complicated novels before deciding whether to devote their life to them.  The thousand-page Russian classics all seem to carry this warning flag. 

Sep 23rd 2017

PRINCETON – This summer, at literary festivals and bookstores around the world, readers celebrated the 20-year anniversary of the debut of the first book in J.K.

Feb 1st 2017

Rarely does a musician with a Juilliard background and a Ph.D. in piano performance find the energy, much less the time, to conceive, plot, write and publish a series of well-constructed novels.

Jan 24th 2017

The Wall Street Journal has made an egregious error. I'm not talking about their coverage of Donald Trump, Russian hacking, or any other such ephemera. This concerns something much more serious: classic literature.

Jan 7th 2017

A Talmudic question has much intrigued me: Two men are stranded in the desert. Only one has water. If he shares it, they both die; if he keeps it, he lives and his companion dies. What should he do? Rabbi Akiva taught that the man has the right to drink it.

Oct 14th 2016

To the surprise of many, Bob Dylan has become the first singer-songwriter to win the Nobel prize in literature.

Sep 13th 2016

It is 100 years since the birth of Roald Dahl – considered by many to be the world’s number one storyteller. His books have received enthusiastic responses from millions of children all around the world.

Mar 5th 2016

Language pedants who take pleasure in policing other people’s use of grammar often have an air of respectability about them, but it’s usually a sheen hiding something more pernici